blog versus modernity |
|
March 22 2008 A Brief Etymology of Tolerance
Isn’t it interesting how the definition of “tolerance” has been transformed from one with an external, demonstrable proof to an internal subjective process of divination as to the presence of that ethereal substance known as “hate”? Tolerance is no longer thus: “You have not imprisoned, deported, or executed me therefore you have been tolerant.” The contemporary (and hopefully temporary) definition is this: “I sense you are not fully on board with our diversity program.” A “scientist” drawing on generous grants from The Bureau, has even devised an analytical process which uses NMRI scans to reveal changes in the brain due what else but...Ta da! Homophobia. Or is it Metrophobia? I always get these neologisms mixed up. That’s fear of haute couture for all you rubes. And of course, only a filthy, self-hating “christohet” would be capable of such barbarity. After all, science has proven that such men are really latent metrosexuals to begin with. They just need a bit of reprogramming, a charge account at Banana Republic, just a bit of SHOCK THERAPY combined with psychotropic drugs, “gay” porno, and fois gras to make them see the light at the end of the velvet goldmine! I’ll see if I can dig up the link. Funny thing, the Scimitar of homo Tolerance swings in one direction, toward what they derisively refer to as “christohets”. You see, tolerance is now the inner suppression of any form of moral opprobrium toward their “lifestyle”. And since paedophilia is a mainstay of their lifestyle, well disapproval of paedophilia must go. Since AIDS executions are a mainstay of their lifestyle, then AIDS “victims” must receive an exemption from the usual methods of dealing with terrorists wielding an invisible weapon more potent than nerve gas. Think I’m exaggerating? Look at the massive depopulation taking place in sub-Saharan Africa from AIDS. Other than via transfusion or similar tragedies, there are no AIDS “victims” unless we are counting self-victimization of perversion. This is what the health community will not say, nor will the evangelicals. But I’ll say it. I’ve got news for the evangelical Judeoxtians. Jesus was intolerant.
|
|