Margaret Sanger must look on with grim despondency from her station in hell. Legal, safe, and rare (and one hastens to add affordable) abortions was the cry of liberals for the last decade. But the “rare” part never materialized. It’s simply human nature. When you reduce the price of a desirable service, its sales increase. Cost is more realistically measured in values other than mere coin. The real cost of abortion has gone steadily down since it became the centerpiece of the equal rights movement.  For reasons of pure human utility, it can no longer be argued that safe and legal means fewer. Rather, it is now obvious that illegal and unsafe is what really means fewer abortions -which is something everyone in the abortion industry has known since its inception. The fear of a back-alley botched abortion claiming one’s life or reproductive capacity is probably the best deterrent imaginable. But feminists don’t really mean the “rare” part. That is a sop to soccer moms who find the whole business highly unpleasant, if not precisely unconscionable -since it is they (or public school “counselors") who are shelling out the dough and toting their weeping daughters off to the abattoir, emasculated dads standing mute in the shadows, afraid of offense or silently supportive of the decision to “terminate”. The stigma of “teen pregnancy” being such that it is like the marks of a disfiguring disease. Life lost, opportunities gone, dreams dead, the young girls are often told.

Here’s a grim calculus for you Benthamites who are so pleased with your greatest good ratiocinations: what are a few women’s lives placed in the balance against millions of white babies -the very babies who will later pay the taxes and fuel the economy whose fruits may then be awarded to those who produce less, invent less, create less, sacrifice less, and are ultimately (from an economic point of view) worth less? Now do you see the terrible “irony” of Sanger’s plague, unleashed upon the West? Sanger was an ardent supporter of eugenics and racial hygiene. Her “feminism” was intended, oddly enough, to liberate White women and reduce the population of those races she considered parasitic. Who’s laughing now? The parasites. The disease is not abortion -that phenomenon is simply a symptom. The disease is feminism, and its epidemiological vector is nearly vertical. If the vast majority of abortions is of white babies (since the guest peoples’ women are provided powerful incentives to keep their babies and have been monetarily priced out of the abortion market), shouldn’t feminism then be considered by any clear-thinking racialist as the chief means of genocide by which those whose interests are aided by the replacement of the White race in the U.S. with a more compliant people? Think about that the next time some white do-gooder soccer mom mouths off about the gender inequality of Christianity -or for that matter some Aryan who purportedly supports White interests. White do-gooders applauding the means of their own genocide is quite akin to Bolshevik intellectuals supporting a worker’s paradise of equality. Their tears for the poor downtrodden client group (women or workers) are either crocodile tears, or they possess an idiocy (sentimentality) that should by law preclude them from reproduction. Here’s a simple equation for you in summary: feminism = abortion = white genocide. Something to ponder the next time someone from the fifth column puts a mic in front of Hillary Clinton’s or Nancy Pelosi’s gaping mouth.

Comments: